The source of control over every aspect of human life comes directly from the United Nations which is ambitiously creating a One-World Government through international treaties and agreements.

Canadians rightfully blame Ottawa while Americans blame Washington, D.C.

The problem is bigger than either national capital city.

But elected members to Parliament and Congress, appointed senators, administrations in power over the last five decades, the judicial activists appointed to Canada's and the U.S.'s supreme courts must bear the burden of blame for bending to the pressures for a global regime.

Public figures and nameless quislings are making a valiant dent in destroying respective constitutions, sovereignties and individual freedoms which our forefathers fought to hard to achieve.

How in the name of Sir William Blackstone and all other judicial scholars can whimsical political policies take precedence over people's rights laid out in British common law, parliamentary statutes and Bill of Rights, none of which have been repealed, revoked, cancelled or withdrawn?

Legally, it can't.

The behemoth scheme is complex. My 1,000-page manuscript, JUSTICE SERVED UP YUKONSLAVIA STYLE (www.dolphinsoftware.bc.ca/firearms/Carlos/index.htm) is an executive summary of how a mafioso institution, run by a bunch of dysfunctional tin-pot thugs, is imposing totalitarian values on how every human in the world will exist, think, behave and not eat.

Readers can derive the gist of what social-engineering has done to individual rights and to free societies by concentrating on Chapter 4, Mining Law Clashes with Eco-Green Ideology; Chapter 15, The Supreme Court of Canada; and Chapter 20, The Epilogue.

The narrative explains how courts and bureaucrats have been successful in withholding individual rights by inserting discretionary licensing, registration and permitting systems into statutes and how non-government organizations (NGOs) are convincing the public that "rights" are only "privileges".

To win a battle, the opponents must know the enemy.

"Know the enemy, know yourself, and victory is never in doubt, not in a hundred battles." That old-as-dirt quote was reiterated by Sun-Tzu, a Chinese General, in his famous treatise, THE ART OF WAR, circa 500 B.C.

"He who knows self but not the enemy will suffer one defeat for every victory," he wrote. "He who knows neither self nor enemy will fail in every battle."

Volunteers currently locked in a battle to retain some semblance of sanity are gallantly holding the line. But troops are doing little more than putting out one fire before another breaks out someplace else. (The Yukon Chamber of Mines used to call this "the bill-of-the-month club).

Since there aren't enough "volunteer firefighters" to deal with the chaos, maybe the best plan is to attack from the rear. Track down the arsonists before they burn the Criminal Code of Canada, too.

Sections 122 and 380 look good for starters. Crime ministers and public servants, who have practiced deceit and breached public trust with money robbed from abused taxpayers, deserve a big fraud bust.

These rogues are schmoozing with the enemy, a threat to our national security. These include the grant-funded freelance bureaucrats, who represent some 20,000 worldwide NGOs. They are paid directly or indirectly through United Nations initiatives that only the ilk of Pol Pot could love.

But they are crafty and cagey. The relatively-new mechanism of governance that skirts the law and ignores legislative process has become pervasive and some learning institutions offer graduate programs to prepare cult leaders for their Marxist-Leninist missions.

Gary Mauser, a PhD professor at the Burnaby, B.C.-based Simon Fraser University, has written a few public policy papers of his own.

His thoughtful editorial graced the pages of the March "Coalition News", the official publication of the Responsible Firearms Owners Coalition of British Columbia.

Gun ownership is the right of all Canadians, Mauser advised.

"North Americans--Canadians as well as Americans--have inherited the right to own and use firearms from the English Bill of Rights."

Anybody bearing the name "Mauser" has to be an authority on gun-ownership rights.

In the same publication, however, the lead article was captioned "Oh Yeah?" It identified another "gotcha" political policy. Tax dollars actually pay warped Ottawa bureaucrats to go into the bowels of government buildings to dream up this sh*t.

Over the last few weeks, I have read reams released by the Gun Control Coalition mommas and the Canadian Firearms Centre spin doctors.

They bragged bucketsful about the enormous success of their wonderful firearms licensing and registration scheme. They contend 85 per cent compliance to be an excellent rate of return for any endeavor.

Yeah, it would be, if it were true.

Ironically, it was the lack of response to an ill-conceived make-work project that drove the Liberal gun-grabbers to embark on a harsher program to beef up compliance.

According to the RFOC newsletter, the Canadian Firearms Centre announced it is implementing a plot called "Continuous Improvement Plan, National Compliance Strategy & Program Objective".

Only a glassy-eyed bureaucrat could wrap his mind around the title, much less discern the purpose!

It seems the mandate is to "Develop a national Compliance Strategy & Program that supports, promotes and enforces compliance with the Firearms Act and its regulations by all individuals and businesses that possess firearms in Canada."

The announcement continued: "(The Firearms Act), in conjunction with other complementary Federal initiatives, provides a comprehensive and far reaching public safety focused approach to Gun Control (sic) in Canada."

Here's the clincher: "FIREARMS POSSESSION/OWNERSHIP IS NOW, CLEARLY A PRIVILEGE, NOT A RIGHT."

Oh, yeah?

It goes on to generously offer a prolonged adjustment period to the gun-owning chimeras.

"This significant shift in public policy will require a period of adjustment to allow the firearms community, law enforcement, and the judicial court system to adapt and adjust to this reality.

"The adjustment will be prolonged by the traditional importance and availability of firearms in our culture and economy."

Oh, yeah?

It's amazing how fast government can act when it distrusts and fears its own citizenry.

On Feb. 26, in Yukon territorial court, a federal deputy judge, who normally presides in British Columbia, ruled on a hearing with respect to a Terrace, B.C.-based firearms officer refusing a Whitehorse resident a POL (Possession Only License).

The matter was non-criminal; guilt or innocence was not at stake, per se. The issue was whether the firearms officer Ray Griffith had acted properly in assessing the applicant's personal history beyond a five-year period.

Crown attorney Ludovic Gouallier contended there was nothing in the act that said the firearms officer can't go beyond the five-year parameters.

Judge D.B. Overend asked: "Why would Parliament pass five years into an act and the firearms officer is able to look beyond?"

I agreed vigorously.

The Crown tabled transcripts of cases in which judges had done so in what was described as a "throw away line".

Judge Overend wished to study the matter carefully. He deliberated two days before rendering a thought-out judgement. He confined his examination to the five years as determined by Parliament; no other judge had provided any reasons for stepping outside the box.

Nevertheless, the judge upheld the firearms officer's decision to refuse the applicant a POL. Near the end of his oral presentation, Judge Overend remarked: CANADIANS DO NOT HAVE RIGHTS TO OWN GUNS.

Oh, yeah?

In the dozens of decisions I have read and heard over the last three years pertain to firearms, I don't recall a judge ever stating that Canadians do not have rights to own guns.

Evidently courts are moving rapidly to embrace the feds' new politically-correct policy.

If Canadians no longer have the rights to own guns, then no Canadian has the right to own anything--personal or otherwise.

That reinforces the Supreme Court of Canada's ruling last July, "Anything you own can be expropriated without due process and without compensation."

That's analogous to the wife who explained ownership to her husband, "Whatever is mine is mine and whatever is your is mine, too."

The top court is a puppet for the United Nations that wants all property and means of production removed from the people in an effort to destroy capitalism and the middle class.

Here is what Plato had to say to us: "Liberty, defined by license, is but a dream. Inevitably, we reap what we sow.

"Who should be surprised that culture of selfishness breeds a nation if idlers and infidels, drunkards and dependents, scoundrels and sluts, power-hungry politicians and apathetic citizens, and thus a nation ripe for tyranny."

-- 30 --

Copyright 2004 diArmani.com