In theory, each political ideology is based on its own distinct philosophies.

In practicality, the lines of textbook-defined ideologies fuzz regardless of which government is in power. It becomes impossible to clearly separate Communism, Marxism, Stalinism, Maoism, Trudeauism, Naziism, Hitlerism, fascism, socialism, liberalism, paganism, environmentalism and democratism.

Each political party rejects or steals shop-worn ideas from another. It is not coincidental that the Communists, Nazis and LIEberal Party of Kanuckistan chose to fly the same political colour: Red.

British Prime Minister Winston Churchill once said, "Democracy is the worst form of government, except for all the others."

The problem is that Bible-based democracies tend to end up as "one of the others", thus descending into a hell hole of moral decay, tyranny, treachery, terrorism and war.

Ideas expressed by Adolf Hitler in Mein Kampf (My Struggles) were offered by Karl Marx in the Communist Manifesto. Both rejected tradition and Christianity as a key to freshen a stale civilization with New Think.

Hitler and Marx detested each other. Hitler, who inherited a few drops of Jewish blood from his father's kin, had to cultivate a hatred for Jews. Marx was a Jew and Jews controlled the popular press, an irritant that Hitler vowed to rectify when the Nazis gained control of Germany and annexed Austria.

Of the several versions of Marx's Communist Manifesto, many ideas were ghost-written by Frederick Engels. If an inquisitive person could contact Marx through a Ouija board and ask what his writings meant, Marx would probably confess he didn't have a flipping clue--and neither do the many thinkers who have unthinkingly wasted over 150 years trying to out-guess him.

Nevertheless, some of those ideas filtered down to Bolshevik Leader Vladimir Lenin and on to Josef Stalin's Communist Russia and into North American democracies.

At one point Hitler was lifting ideas from his arch enemy Stalin, and Marxism was being adopted by the Nazis who despised Marx.

How could Hitler and Marx possibly be at opposite ends of the pole, as political pundits like to espouse? They were influenced and inspired by some of the same philosophers.

One mentor was the German philosopher Frederick Nietzsche who was diagnosed in an asylum as certifiably deranged before dying of full-blown insanity.

Nietzsche admired the naturalist Charles Darwin whose vivid imagination about natural selection did not come within a whisker as a scientific fact. It is a theory.

Everybody knows a theory is nothing more than a good story made up the morning after being out on an all-night drunk. The method worked swell for Ernest Hemingway and William Faulner who were legendary for making up famed fictional yarns.

Students study the classics of the Great American Writers, for sure. But Marxist professors shove Darwin's fairy tales down students' collective throats as gospel while the true Gospel is defamed as hate literature.

How does that work? It doesn't.

Darwin's theory, "The Origin of Species of Natural Selection: The Preservation of Favored Races in the Struggle for Life", culminated into a book published in 1859--three years after Homo sapien neanderthalensis was discovered in Germany.

Interestingly, the nations that hold to highly moral, ethical and spiritual integrity and a sense of national pride and identity are difficult for any enemy to conquer, either with military force or rotting people's minds with psycho-politics.

To do so means mankind must first be degraded into believing he is of less value than the lower animal kingdom. Every person of every church must be discredited.

Christianity and other religions must be made unfashionable in order to stamp them out to make room for paganism and environmentalism. The spiritual soul of man must be demonstrated to be non-existent. Once destroyed in his mind, man will learn that a human conquerer now owns his body and soul.

Through the education system and pseudo-science, humans are taught to truly believe that they are the least important of all animal and plant species on Earth.

Their higher-level spirituality and intelligence, unique to the human species, must be replaced with the belief that man is a low life species descended from nothing better than a disgusting, disease-spreading germ.

For this reason, the elitist decision-makers would never tolerate the mixing of scientific theory and Christianity in the classroom. The result has led the enemy on a crusade to degrade the white, heterosexual, Anglo-Saxon male into a deadbeat role and to annihilate Christianity.

It's unlikely that the Bible literally meant that God created heaven and Earth in a six-day work week based on a 24-hour clock. God probably neeeded eons of time to create his cosmic domain and to evolve man from a lower life form through stages into a higher life form.

Or, perhaps God really was operating on a 24-hour clock. One day in a spurt of loneliness and inspiration, He miraculously created instant company by blowing life into man's nostrils, then sent out invitations for man to join Him for a dinner party.

One supernatural event is as plausible or implausible as the other. If the education system is going to teach one, what's wrong with teaching both?

When parents asked why the creation theory couldn't be taught in public schools to provide children with a balanced approach, the heretical outcry sounded like shrieking banshees.

The classrooms forevermore would be silenced from speaking the Lord's Prayer in unison, paying respect to flags, singing national anthems and the teaching of Biblical foolishness.

This lack of instilling spiritual integrity and national pride in the youth would soon render Christian nations ripe for a One-World Government.

The noise from the master quislings--those traitors who treacherously prepare the way for enemy occupation--is still reverberating in the form of the 1925 Tennessee Scopes Trial and the 1933 to 1945 European Holocaust.

Hitler psyched himself into a madman frenzy of believing that Jews were vermin-infested and of no more worth than sub-human insects.

To him, carrying out an extermination "pogram" was an act of goodness in accordance with the will of the Almighty Creator. Yes, Hitler at one time wrote of God as a Supreme Being. That was before he rose to Nazi Fuehrer and destroyed all the sacred gathering places for Protestants, Catholics and Jews, and established a German Evangelical Church according to the doctrine of the Nazi religion.

Christians had a right to be nervous about the dangers presented by a government that trumped the creation theory with the evolution theory. If it became a crime to teach the creation theory in public schools, it wouldn't be long before it was a crime for Darwinism to be taught in churches.

The freedom of thought, expression and religion were in danger of being sucked into a cosmological Black Hole.

Newspaperman H.L. Mencken, a libertarian and wit who covered the Monkey Trial, was devoid of any religious training, except to attend Methodist Sunday School as a boy to give his father free time for a nap, he said.

He could not tolerate intolerance brought on by religion. The writer contended that the human race was so obviously flawed that man could not possibly have been the creation of an omnipotent God, but, at best, the bungled effort of an incompetent committee.

He believed deeply that individuals should be left to pursue happiness as they saw fit, with as little interference as possible from government and any other busy body or moral uplifter.

"No human right is one-tenth as valuable as the simple right to utter what seems at the moment to be the truth," he wrote during the Monkey Trial.

Studying The Origin of Species, Mein Kampf, the Communist Manifesto and the Holy Bible should be scholarly ammunition to help students learn HOW to think and not Marxist tools to brainwash students into WHAT to think.

Just as professors today get into legal jams for denying the Holocaust happened, professors of yesterday got into hot water for either teaching evolution as a truth or teaching it as an untruth.

Which is it? Dunno.

Buddha's instructions were: "Believe nothing merely because you have been told it. Do not believe what your teacher tells you merely out of respect for the teacher. But, whatsoever, after due examination and anlysis, you find to be kind, conducive to the good, the benefit, the welfare of all beings--believe and cling to that doctrine and take it as your guide."

Good and evil men of history did that. Frederick Nietzsche wanted to see the development of a super race. And Hitler was inspired to oblige the German philosopher. Although Hitler had to learn to be anti-Christ and anti-Jew he rationalized in Mein Kampf that by purifying the race he was carrying out his work for the Lord.

Nietzsche was completely opposed to Christian morality, which he thought was a crutch to support the weak. The strong didn't need to lean on Christianity and could survive on brute behaviour, immorality, bodily pleasures and paganism.

Nietzsche believed the German superior race was destined to rule the civilized world, anyway. Hitler decided to give it a push with social engineering, an evil concept the LIEberal Party of Kanuckistan embraced greedily.

Darwin had contended that higher levels of biological existence are attainable. In the struggle for survival, the strong dominate while the weak are weeded out as unfit.

Hitler transferred the lower animal species theory to the higher human species--the master race which he represented. Based on the Darwinian theory, Hitler set about killing the imperfect to achieve the perfect.

Hitler saw himself as a replacement of the spiritual God. He would be hero worshipped. He would own the people, body and soul. He would decide what they ate. He would decide they couldn't smoke tobacco products. He alone would decide who would live and who would die.

In the evolution of man, Homo habilis was learning to take upright baby steps. He was a handy man around the kingdom with his stone tools.

Homo erectus discovered incendiaries and was setting forests on fire.

Homo sapiens used fire to barbeque food. He used the brain to change grunts into the first vowels of a human language. No doubt the first words were "roast" and "burn".

Homo sapiens neanderthalensis was first discovered in Germany in 1856 and was believed to be from 150,000 to 40,000 years old. He was kind of a cute rendition of modern man.

The next level was described in the 1920s by H.L. Mencken as Homo boobien who lacked the intelligence to understand his own folly and superstitions.

Homo boobien is quite similar to the present-day Homo klutz who retired his God-given brain circuitry and is running around with lit matches burning constitutions and private property.

After God wasted more than a million years nurturing man, he regressed into a 10-percent IQ, knuckle-dragging, acronymn-uttering, babbling bozo. He keeps tripping over his own feet and falling flat on his face in a rush to return to his evolutionary roots of walking on all fours.

Is there no end to human stupidity? Dunno.

Prior to Charles Darwin's theory setting off the mass murder of 13 million people in Nazi concentration and extermination camps, the naturalist was responsible for bringing on the Monkey Trial that turned Christianity into a religious farce.

The State of Tennessee challenged John Scopes, a willing pawn, and put God on the stand. The mockery was staged for the purpose of appealing the Big Question of teaching evolution in southern schools to the Tennessee Supreme Court.

Scopes, a collegiate-looking science teacher, taught evolution from a biology textbook sold at the local drugstore in Dayton, Tennessee. William Jennings Bryan, a several time loser as a Democratic U.S. presidential candidate, kickstarted the trial, suspiciously as a holier-than-thou publicity stunt in the Bible Belt.

Clarence Darrow, 70, was defense counsel. Barbed insults, hurled back and forth between the atheist and the judge, made grand newspaper copy, as did the forced apologies.

One of the 11 students to testify told the court that Mr. Scopes had instructed the class about man and all other mammals evolving from a one-celled organism.

Biologists don't have a flipping clue now any more than then about the origin of life. Was the one-cell organism a communicable-disease germ? Dunno.

Physicists don't have a flipping clue how the universe was created. Somebody came up with the Big Bang theory to receive another bucket of research money. When did the Bang bang? Dunno. How did the Bang bang? Dunno

Yet hardly a scientist dares dispute the Big Bang theory. Why? Because it would upset the hypothetical apple cart; or, more likely, the so-called scientists are too damned lazy to find another theory with as much bang as the big one. They don't have to fear being ostracized as nutbars and losing out on Big Bang's Big Bucks extended from wealthy foundations for research.

The scientists justify their cosmic theories as fact by using operative words like "if", "possibly", "suggests", "maybe", or plain old "must have been". When the universe was younger, they say, it MUST HAVE BEEN hotter. Was it? Or wasn't it? Dunno. But MUST HAVE BEEN solves a myriad of problems.

What's the meaning of existence? Dunno. Does man and the universe exist? Dunno. Why are dinosaurs extinct and monkeys aren't? Dunno. What happened to the dinosaurs? Dunno. Somebody found a gaping crater and theorized that the enormous meterorite MUST HAVE squashed all the dozing reptiles who had migrated south to winter in the Arizona sunshine.

Did the Nazis cultivate their own brand of brutal, brainwashed homosexuals from a healthy male species? Or were the legions of sexual perverts the bungled creation of a committee? Or did the sexually confused evolve naturally from swarms of brainless fruit flies? Dunno. Dunno. Dunno.

Scientists divide themselves into at least two camps to keep the pot boiling with meaningless prattle. They keep theorizing after their drunken nights out on the town.

What would they do if the answers to the Big Questions suddenly smacked them in the face? Dejection? What would they do with their spare time? What would they do for a paycheque and with their deflated egos? Dunno. Dunno. Dunno. Dunno.

When it comes down to the crunch, the only definite answers truthful scientific researchers can offer about the formation of the universe, origin of species, the death of dinosaurs, the creation of homosexuals and other scientific mediocrity, is, "It beats the hell outta me."

If anti-Christians continue to debunk the Bible as nothing more astonishing than Aesop's fables with a theme, at least the human race has a guiding light to lead it through a moral and ethical existence.

The Bible is the solid foundation on which British law and its offshoots of American and Canadian constitutions, bill and charter of rights and the criminal codes are based. Without the Bible, there could be no rule of law to protect an individual's rights and freedoms in a civilized society. There could only be anarchy and horror.

The Bible at least has validity. But scientific theories are nothing more than counterfeit data input into computers for models, fictional reports published prematurely in scientific journals and illogical jibberish smuggled into classrooms and laboratories.

Would the world have been better off without Darwin? Yes.

But what useless theories would primates be bickering over at this time in history if Charles Darwin had never existed?

Dunno.

-- 30 --

Copyright 2006 diArmani.com